Avedis Afficher le profil Voir les messages. On top of perks, as you level you'll come in contact with higher capacity shields. Most pvpers use whichever shield has the highest capacity. I'm currently ego 1, and have a shield that Keep that in mind. This doesn't guarantee that you will switch teams though.
Low Ego Level players want to play PvP too. So they have a fighting chance, everyone will get boosted to the highest EGO in a match. Currently, the highest EGO possible is 5. Keep in mind: Your weapons and shields should be as close to your ego as possible to get the most out of the boost!
Those matches end when:. You have to stand close to capture points. First, you need neutralize them, then capture them for your team. Each team starts at one end of the map.
There are three Cap Points that can be captured and defended. Players of the enemy team cannot get into the Spawn Area. Open World, all over the map excluding Silicon Valley , represented by a purple circle on the map.
Note: You have to sign up to participate in Shadow Wars. You are not automatically participating when being in the area. Not protected or closed off from the enemy team. Computer, Electronics and Gaming Reviews.
Share the joy. Leave a Reply Click here to cancel reply. Don't Have An Account? Latest Forum Topics Today. Router login issues [Solved] Where are clear tech info videos? Popular Tutorials This Week. Popular Blogs This Week.
All Rights Reserved. Epic at its prime had a lot of PvErs playing, which Defiance can also have really. There's the starter zones and even outside of them you can play in relative peace if you don't build on the frontlines and use some simple common sense like not going AFK off-deed and not bringing unrelated tools if you are off-deed.
I don't have answers and I wont claim or pretend to, all I know is that punishing people and penalising them for one play style or another is never the solution. You shouldnt be playing PVP to make money. If you dont like that then make money on pve. TLDR: If you couldn't cross back and forth, your pvp character would actually have to "live" there, which would mean you have to be there to skill, which would in turn mean more pvpers on the pvp server at any given time.
More people and therefore more pvp on a pvp server would, in and of itself, be an incentive for anyone who wants pvp I would think. Well, I don't play pvp in Wurm and likely never will because many things about Wurm pvp are Nuff said on that. But there is one thing I've always thought was a big contributor to the pvp servers always ending up empty eventually.
That's this whole thing about crossing back and forth. Don't get me wrong, it's a nice idea that you can play both with the same character and play with your pve friends and vice verse, but it never seems to work out the way it's envisioned. I just have to wonder if that isn't a big contributor. In most games I've played that have separate pvp servers, you have to have a pvp character that only plays on that server.
You have a pvp character that is always a pvp character and "lives" in that community, with all that entails. In a game like Wurm, where the pvp is dependent on things like community building things together, fortifying, raiding, full loot, etc, etc, etc, being able to go play "elsewhere" for your character building and crafting and resource gathering, etc.
I just fail to see how pvp can happen regularly when a large portion of the population is busy skilling on the pve servers. So nobody's home, so no pvp happening, so go skill some more on pve, so nobody's home.
The ol' proverbial "vicious circle. I don't know if I'm making any sense here, lol. It's early and I need more coffee. It's just something I've always thought about Wurm pvp. I think the two should be separate. Have a pvp character if you want one, and a separate pve character if you want one.
This way, if you want to play pvp, you will have to actually spend your time there to build your character, your pvp character would have to "live" there, which as a consequence will mean population will be higher and I would think that pvp would happen more. Seems like a no brainer to me but since I don't pvp in Wurm I'm sure there's probably something I'm missing here. I'm not sure if you even bothered to read the post, this is completely unrelated to the topic. We're saying that PvP needs more incentives to keep people there instead of making it objectively more efficient to play on freedom and cross over to PvP.
We're asking to give people incentives to play there. Yes, exactly this! The crossing between servers removed almost all reasons for people to be on PvP servers with any persistence. This exact thing is what killed the Epic population. I think a huge issue here is allowing priests to transfer to pve and suffer no downsides on the pvp side. Been struggling with this personally, why shouldn't I priest?
0コメント